1
Corresponding author: Master of Environmental Management and Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2
Master of Organizational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Tehran, Iran
3
Assistant Professor Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Iran
Abstract
Looking to the future and the direction of the movement of different religious schools is derived from the ideology that governs them. The formation of a world government in both the Jewish and Islamic schools also stems from this view. In this article, in order to understand this issue, to recognize the prevailing approach in both schools by qualitative content analysis method, after examining the three concepts of utopia, the promised and the apocalypse, from the perspective of which school in the world can build humanity better. To guide the favorable future, the important features claimed in the formation of the world government of the two schools of Judaism and Islam were extracted and compared with each other. The most important common features include seven features and the most important differences are six features. In terms of the features required for a school to form a single world government in the end of time, by examining the features proposed for both the Jewish and Islamic world governments in the future, the school of Islam has higher and higher capacity, talent and characteristics than the formation of a government at the level He owns the world and without political orientation towards a specific nation or race, he seeks to achieve justice in all the affairs of the society.
قیومیپور، رضا و غلامی، روحالله. (1399). بررسی آیندهاندیشی در مکتب لیبرالیسم و تطبیق آن با آیندهاندیشی اسلامی. فصلنامه آیندهپژوهی انقلاب اسلامی، 1(3): 180-155.
کریم زاده، اصغر و ملایی،حسن. (1388). تا دولت کریمه (بررسی رسالتها و راهبردهای فرهنگی تربیتی دولت زمینهساز). فصلنامه مشرق موعود، ، 3(10): 224-199.
کریمی، سید حسن و معتمدی، منصور. (1400). آیندهاندیشی از منظر یهود. فصلنامه آیندهپژوهی انقلاب اسلامی،2(2): 145-113.
کریمینیا، محمدمهدی و انصاری مقدم،مجتبی و اریک، رحیم. (1399). وعدههای آخرالزمانی و موعودگرایی در آئین یهود. مجله پژوهش و مطالعات علوم اسلامی،2(20): 133-122.
محبتی مقدم، امید. (1396). منجی جهان و عصر ظهور از دیدگاه آئین یهود. فصلنامه پژوهشهای مهدوی،4(20): 114-91.
مطلبی، مسعود و نادری، محمدمهدی. (1388). بررسی تطبیقی مفهوم آرمانشهر در اندیشه سیاسی اسلام ایران و غرب. فصلنامه مطالعات سیاسی، 2(6): 146-125.
معین نجفآبادی، سعیده. (1390). بررسی تشابهات کارویژههای حکومت موعود در اندیشه شیعه و یهود. فصلنامه انتظار موعود،11(34): 174-145.
Goodarzi, M., nasiripour, M. & hamze, F. (2022). A comparative study of the future of world government formation in the Jewish and Islamic schools. Futures Studies Of The Islamic Revolution, 3(2), 37–63.
MLA
Goodarzi, M., nasiripour, M., & hamze, F. "A comparative study of the future of world government formation in the Jewish and Islamic schools", Futures Studies Of The Islamic Revolution, 3, 2, 2022, 37–63.
HARVARD
Goodarzi, M., nasiripour, M., & hamze, F. (2022). 'A comparative study of the future of world government formation in the Jewish and Islamic schools', Futures Studies Of The Islamic Revolution, 3(2), pp. 37–63.
CHICAGO
Goodarzi, M., nasiripour, M. & hamze, F., "A comparative study of the future of world government formation in the Jewish and Islamic schools." Futures Studies Of The Islamic Revolution, 3 2 (2022): 37–63,
VANCOUVER
Goodarzi M., nasiripour M., hamze F. A comparative study of the future of world government formation in the Jewish and Islamic schools. Futures Studies Of The Islamic Revolution. 2022;3(2):37–63 (In Persian).