سواد آینده؛ مهارت لازم برای زندگی در قرن 15 خورشیدی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 نویسنده مسئول: کارشناسی ارشد، مدیریت اجرایی، دانشگاه تهران ، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار آزمایشگاه پژوهشی فضای سایبر، گروه مهندسی کامپیوتر، دانشکده مهندسی، پردیس فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

چکیده

مفهوم سواد، برای همه‌ انسان‌ها، مفهوم و موضوعی بدیهی و آشناست. در گذشته، خواندن و نوشتن، سواد محسوب می‌شد و امروز، ابعاد جدیدی از سواد، ذیل عنوان سواد کارکردی، آشکار و عمومی شده است. این پژوهش، یک پژوهش کیفی و تحلیلی بوده که با استفاده از روش پژوهش کتابخانه‌ای انجام شده است. موضوعاتی و مهارت‌هایی همچون سواد رسانه، سواد داده، سواد دیجیتال، سواد سیاسی، سواد مالی، سواد فناوری و ...، به‌وفور در افواه و رسانه‌ها طرح و بحث شده است. مطالعه‌ آینده در 50 سال اخیر، به موضوعی جدی در دانش بشری تبدیل شده است و همین جدیت، الزام بهره‌گیری عمومی از آینده را رقم زده است. برهمین‌مبنا، در سال‌های اخیر، یک عنوان مهارتی نوین دیگر به سواد کارکردی افزوده شده است که تحت عنوان «سواد آینده» شناخته می‌شود. این پژوهش، فتح‌باب پرداختن به سواد آینده در زبان فارسی است و با طرح معیار زمان در تقسیم‌بندی سواد، سواد آینده را به نسبت سواد گذشته و سواد اکنون و به‌عنوان مهارتی ضروری برای انسان ایرانی در قرن 15 خورشیدی طرح و بررسی کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Literacy in Future: Required Skills for Living in the 15th Solar Century

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Shamsoddini 1
  • Kazem Fouladi Gale 2
1 Corresponding Author: Master, Executive Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Cyberspace Research Laboratory, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The concept of literacy is quite obvious and familiar to all human beings. In the past, literacy included reading and writing; today, however, new dimensions of literacy, under the heading of functional literacy, have emerged apparently. Issues and skills such as media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy, political literacy, financial literacy, technological literacy are being widely discussed in the media and among people. This is a qualitative - analytical research which employs library research method. The study of the future has turned into a serious issue in human literacy in the last 50 years, and this significance has made it necessary to make public use of the future studies. Accordingly, another new skill-based topic has been added to functional literacy, known as “future literacy”. This research involves initial attempts of future literacy in Persian language. Proposing time criterion in dividing literacy issues, this research has investigated future literacy related to past and present literacy as an essential skill for Iranian human beings in the 15th century.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Future literacy
  • functional literacy
  • future thought
  • anticipatory systems
  • futures study

Smiley face

مراجع

  1. نهج‌البلاغه (1392)، قم: دفتر نشر معارف.
  2. Alexander, G. K. (2020). Supporting food literacy among children and adolescents: Undergraduate students apply public health nursing principles in clinical practice. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(6), 616–624.
  3.      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.08.018
  4. Beck, J. S., & Nunnaley, D. (2020). A continuum of data literacy for teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100871
  5. Bennett, S. M. (2014). Teachers’’Beliefs, Knowledge, and Implementation of Disciplinary Literacy Pedagogy in Three Advanced Placement United States History Classrooms. The Georgia Social Studies, 4(2), 53–67. Retrieved from: https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1425356154?accountid=7113%5Cnhttp://dq4wu5nl3d.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Full+T
  6. Canadian Council on Learning. (2007). State of Learning in Canada: No Time for Complacency. In Canadian Council on Learning. Ottawa, Ontario.
  7. Davies, I. (2017). Debates in History Teaching (2nd ed.).
  8.       https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642864
  9. Flornes, K. (2017). Promoting Civic Literacy in Teacher Education: A Framework for Personal and Professional Development. In Media and Information Literacy in Higher Education: Educating the Educators (pp. 37–50). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100630-6.00003-5
  10. Gnambs, T. (2021). The development of gender differences in information and communication technology (ICT) literacy in middle adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106533
  11. Gui, Z., Huang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2021). Whom to educate? Financial literacy and investor awareness. China Economic Review, 67, 101608.
  12.       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101608
  13. Guzzetti, B. J. (2002). Literacy in America: An Encyclopedia ofHistory, Theory, and Practice. In ABC-CLIO, Inc. Santa Barbara.
  14. Johnson, P. C. (2014). Cultural literacy, cosmopolitanism and tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 44(1), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.10.006
  15. Kauhanen-Simanainen, A. (2007). Corporate Literacy: Why is it needed? In Corporate Literacy (pp. 13–61). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-84334-261-8.50001-8
  16. Kılıçaslan, H., & Kuloglu, N. (2015). Visual Literacy during the Period of Architectural Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2824–2828.
  17.       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.711
  18. Louie, A. H. (2010). Robert Rosen’s anticipatory systems. Foresight, 12(3), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681011049848
  19. Manca, S., Bocconi, S., & Gleason, B. (2021). “Think globally, act locally”: A glocal approach to the development of social media literacy. Computers and Education, 160, 104025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104025
  20. Martins, A., Madaleno, M., & Dias, M. F. (2020). Energy literacy: What is out there to know? Energy Reports, 6, 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.007
  21. Milér, T., & Sládek, P. (2011). International conference on education and educational psychology (ICEEPSY 2010) The climate literacy challenge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.021
  22. Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures, 39(4), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001
  23. Miller, R., & Poli, R. (2010). Anticipatory systems and the philosophical foundations of futures studies. Foresight, 12(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/fs.2010.27312caa.001
  24. Miller, R., Poli, R., & Rossel, P. (2013). The Discipline of Anticipation: Exploring Key Issues.
  25. Nokes, J. (2012). Building Students’ Historical Literacies: Learning to Read and Reason with Historical Texts and Evidence. Routledge.
  26. OECD. (2000). Literacy in the information age: FINAL REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL ADULT LITERACY SURVEY. In OECD Publications Service. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170008200118
  27. Olaniyi, F. O. (2015). Basic and Functional Literacy and the Attainment of Vision 20- 2020 in Nigeria. Developing Country Studies, 5(14), 22–26. Retrieved from:
  28.       https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/DCS/article/viewFile/23794/24365
  29. Polizzi, G. (2020). Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Computers and Education, 152, 103859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103859
  30. Rosen, R. (2012). Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical, and Methodological Foundations (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
  31. Slaughter, R. (1998). Futures studies as an intellectual and applied discipline. American Behavioural Scientist, 42(3), 372–385.
  32. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The Psychologist’s Companion: A Guide to Scientific Writing for Students and Researchers. Cambridge University Press.
  33. Su, H. J., Chen, M. J., & Wang, J. T. (2011, December 1). Developing a water literacy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 3, pp. 517–519.
  34.       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.10.010
  35. Sudhakar, R. (2017). Types of Literacy. Mumbai.
  36. Toivonen, S., Rashidfarokhi, A., & Kyrö, R. (2021). Empowering upcoming city developers with futures literacy. Futures, 129(December 2019).
  37.       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102734
  38. U.S. Department of Education, N. C. for E. S. I. of E. S. (2012). NCES Handbook of Survey Methods National. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
  39. UNESCO. (1979). Records of the General Conference Twentieth Session Paris, 24 October to 28 November 1978. In The General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Vol. 1).
  40. UNESCO. (2018). Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century (R. Miller, Ed.). paris: Routledge.
  41. Wahl, A. K., Osborne, R. H., Larsen, M. H., Andersen, M. H., Holter, I. A., & Borge, C. R. (2021). Exploring health literacy needs in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): Associations between demographic, clinical variables, psychological well-being and health literacy. Heart and Lung, 50(3), 417–424.
  42.       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.02.007
  43. Zou’bi, R. Al. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100782

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 22 اردیبهشت 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 31 خرداد 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 31 خرداد 1400
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 خرداد 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار