بررسی تطبیقی آینده‌پژوهی بُعد سیاسیِ حکمرانی خوب در نظام امت-امامت و نظام لیبرال دموکراسی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی مقطع دکتری تخصصی رشته آینده‌پژوهی، دانشکده و پژوهشکده حضرت ولی‌عصر(عج)، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین(ع)، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار علوم سیاسی، دانشکده معارف و اندیشه اسلامی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد رشته مدیریت بازرگانی، موسسه عالی آموزش و پژوهش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش جاری به دنبال بررسی تطبیقی آینده‌پژوهی بعد سیاسی حکمرانی خوب در نظام امت-امامت و نظام لیبرال دموکراسی بوده است. در این پژوهش دیدگاه نظام لیبرال دموکراسی و دیدگاه نظام امت-امامت درباره بعد سیاسی حکمرانی خوب به روش تطبیقی یا مقایسه‌ای بررسی شده و شباهت‌ها و تفاوت‌های دو نظام در این خصوص استخراج و تشریح شده است. یافته‌ها نشان داد اصطلاح حکمرانی خوب اگر چه طی سالیان اخیر در مجامع سیاسی طرح شده است، اما این مفهوم قرن‌ها پیش مورد توجه و تأیید اسلام قرار داشته و جالب‌تر اینکه شاخصه‌های حکمرانی مطلوب با دقت و گستردگی بیشتر در اسلام مطرح شده است. نتایج بیان کننده این بود بین حکمرانی خوب از دیدگاه نظام لیبرال دموکراسی(غرب) و حکمرانی خوب با رویکرد نظام امت-امامت(اسلام) در ظاهر شباهت‌هایی وجود دارد اما این دو مقوله با یکدیگر تفاوت‌هایی جدی و عمیق دارند، که از مهم‌ترین و مبنایی‌ترین این تفاوت‌ها، تک‌بعدی(مادی بودن) حکمرانی خوب غربی و دوبعدی(مادی و الهی بودن) حکمرانی خوب با رویکرد اسلامی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A comparative study of future studies on the political dimension of good governance in the ummah-imamate system and the liberal democracy system

نویسندگان [English]

  • Milad Ghanbari 1
  • Gholamali Soleimani 2
  • Seyyed Mostafa Tabatabaei 3
1 Ph.D. student in future studies, Faculty and Research Institute of Hazrat ValiAsr(A.S), Imam Hossein(A.S) Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Education and Islamic Thought, University of Tehran, Iran
3 Master of Business Administration, Higher Institute of Management and Planning Education and Research, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The current research has followed the comparative investigation of the future studies of the political dimension of good governance in the ummah-imamate system and the liberal democracy system. In this research, the point of view of the liberal democracy system and the point of view of the ummah-imamate system about the political dimension of good governance have been examined in a comparative or comparative method, and the similarities and differences of the two systems have been extracted and explained in this regard. The findings showed that although the term good governance has been proposed in recent years in political gatherings, this concept has received the attention and approval of Islam centuries ago, and it is more interesting that the indicators of desirable governance have been proposed more accurately and comprehensively in Islam. The results showed that there are similarities between good governance from the point of view of the liberal democracy system (West) and good governance with the approach of the ummah-imamate system (Islam), but these two categories have serious and deep differences with each other, which are the most important and fundamental These differences are the one-dimensionality (materiality) of good governance in the West and the two-dimensionality (materiality and divineness) of good governance with an Islamic approach.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • آینده‌پژوهی
  • حکمرانی خوب
  • نظام امت-امامت
  • نظام لیبرال دموکراسی
  • روش مقایسه‌ای

Smiley face

مراجع

  1. Abdullah naesab, Mohammad Reza; Mirzazadeh, Faramarz. (1401). The components of optimal governance in the Islamic system: with an emphasis on the thought and action of Ayatollah Shahid Beheshti. The Quarterly Journal of New Approaches to Jihadi Management and Islamic Governance. No. 12, pp. 1-21. [In Persian] 
  2. Abdullah Nasab, Mohammad Reza. (2018). Indicators of good governance in the system of ummah and imamate. Journal of political research. Volume 6, Number 15, pp. 2783-4999. [In Persian] 
  3. Abedi Darcheh, Mohsen; Zarei, Bahadur; Ahmadi, Seyyed Abbas; Pishgahifard, Zahra. (2019). Comparative explanation of the two approaches of Islamic transcendental governance and good governance. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Research. Year 9, No. 34, pp. 177-205. [In Persian] 
  4. Ahmadi, Shahrazad. (1400). Examining the theory of good governance based on public trust and social capital. Accounting and Management Perspective Quarterly. Volume 4, No. 44, pp. 1-12. [In Persian] 
  5. Ahmadnejad, Ako; Ahmadi, Yaqub; edrisi, afsaneh. (1400). Muluk al-Tawaifi, national government or nation state: analyzing the understanding of the nation state in the thought of intellectuals of the Qajar period. Iranian Journal of Sociology. Volume 22, No. 1, pp. 118-90. [In Persian] 
  6. ajili, hadi; Ismaeili Ardakani, Ali. (2014). State alternatives in Islamic and Western critical discourse. Politics Quarterly. Volume 45, Number 3, pp. 533-550. [In Persian] 
  7. Amirquasmi, Ayub. (1390). Nation-state crisis and its possible future. Biannual scientific research journal "Theoretical Policy Research". No. 9, pp. 81-102. [In Persian] 
  8. Bell, Wendell. (2003). Foundations of futurology: history, goals and knowledge. Translator: Mostafa Tagvi, Mohsen Mohaghegh. Tehran: Educational and Research Institute of Defense Industries, Future Research Center of Defense Science and Technology. [In Persian] 
  9. Bustani, Ahmed. (2019). nation-state in Iran; A political-philosophical attitude. Scientific Quarterly of Middle East Studies. Year 28, No. 1, pp. 7-30. [In Persian] 
  10. Darivand, Mohammad Sadeq. (1401). The position and role of the people in the establishment and continuity of the ummah and imamate system in the light of Martyr Beheshti's opinions. Legal Civilization Journal. Volume 5, No. 12, pp. 467-487. [In Persian] 
  11. Hajiani, Ibrahim. (2016). Basics, principles and methods of future research. Tehran: Imam Sadegh University (AS). [In Persian] 
  12. Haqpanahan, Hamidreza; Karmi, Hamed; Hemati, Mojtabi. (1400). The relationship between good governance and protection of social capital as one of the components of soft power with a look at the constitution of J.A.A. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Soft Power Studies. Year 11, number one, pp. 137-168. [In Persian] 
  13. Hosseini Tash, Seyed Ali; Wathiq, Qader Ali. (2013). good governance and providing competent governance; Review and indicators of these two from the point of view of Amir al-Momenin Ali (AS). Journal of Islam and Management Research. Third year, second issue, pp. 7-28. [In Persian] 
  14. Jalalpur, Shohreh; Paifard, Kianoush; Fallah, Mohammad. (2014). The decline of the nation-state concept in the age of globalization. International Political Research Quarterly. No. 23, pp. 35-66. [In Persian] 
  15. Jawanmard, Mehdi; Daneshfard, Karam olah; Taheri Guderzi, Hojjat; Abbaszadeh Sohron, Yadolah. (1401). Identifying and determining the components and indicators of good governance with the approach of the Islamic-Iranian model in public organizations (a study on the organization of municipalities and rural districts of the country). Scientific Monthly of Iranian Sociology. Fifth year, number ten, pp. 2267-2242. [In Persian] 
  16. Jezini Darcheh, Ruholeh; Manzari Tavakoli, Alireza; Pourkiyani, Massoud; Selajeqa, Sanjar. (1401). Indicators of good governance and good citizenship with emphasis on the role of different ethnicities. Scientific Monthly of Iranian Sociology. Fifth year, ninth issue, pp. 675-689. [In Persian] 
  17. Mashhadhi, Ali; Jalili-Morad, Ayatollah. (2016). Orderism from the perspective of martyr Beheshti in the light of the theory of ummah and imamate. Journal of government jurisprudence. Third issue, pp. 7-23. [In Persian] 
  18. meemar, Rahmatullah. (1385). A comparative study of the theories of liberal democracy and religious democracy from the perspective of Imam Khomeini (RA). Mateen research paper. No. 38, pp. 122-97. [In Persian] 
  19. Nabavyan Hamzekolahi, Seyyed Mohammad Reza; Bagherzadeh, Mohammad Reza; Jafari Kalarijani, Seyyed Ahmad; Tabari, Mojtaba. (1400). Designing a local model of good governance based on religious teachings. Scientific Journal of Islamic Management. Year 29, No. 4, pp. 81-114. [In Persian]
  20. nahadi, hadi; Siahkali Moradi, Javad. (1400). Examining the indicators of good governance and decent governance from the perspective of Nahj al-Balagha. Supreme governance magazine. No. 6, pp. 114-138. [In Persian]
  21. Navaei, Ali Akbar. (1385). The social system of Ummah and Imamat. Andisheh magazine. The twelfth year, numbers 5 and 6, pp. 91-114. [In Persian]
  22. Nazemi Ardakani, Mohammad. (2011). Good governance with an Islamic approach. Development strategy magazine. No. 31, pp. 64-88. [In Persian]
  23. Nikonhad, Hamed; Makaram, Ruhollah. (2019). A reflection on the challenges of the ummah-imamate system in meeting the requirements of the modern government in the system of fundamental rights of the Islamic Republic. Knowledge Quarterly of Public Law. Year 9, No. 28, pp. 71-92. [In Persian]
  24. Panahi, Sajjad; Mohseni, Ali. (1400). The effect of the ummah system and martyr Beheshti's imamate in drafting the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The specialized scientific quarterly of Sepehr Politeh. Year 8, No. 28, pp. 58-74. [In Persian] 
  25. Peyghan, Vahid; Yaqoubi, Noor Mohammad; Kikha, Alame. (1401). Measuring and validating the model of good governance with sustainable development approach (a study in Sistan and Baluchistan). Journal of Public Administration Studies in Iran. The fifth year, number 2, pp. 117-138. [In Persian] 
  26. Raei, Masoud. (2011). A comparative approach to government supervision in Islam and liberal democracy. Political and International Research Quarterly. No. 10, pp. 171-196. [In Persian] 
  27. Rahmatifar, Samaneh. (2018). Good governance: a model for identifying and applying gender equality indicators. Legal Research Quarterly. No. 93, pp. 325-346. [In Persian] 
  28. Samiei Esfahani, Alireza; Norouzinejad, Jafar. (2012). International nation-state-building and political violence in the new Iraq. Iranian research journal of international politics. Second year, number 1, pp. 121-95. [In Persian] 
  29. Sarparast saadat, Seyyed Ibrahim. (1401). Comparing the Islamic state with secular and liberal Western states: a civilizational perspective. Biannual scientific journal of fundamental studies of modern Islamic civilization. Volume 5, Number 1, pp. 122-97. [In Persian] 
  30. Shariati, Ali. (1348). Ummah and imamate. Sepideh Bavaran Publications. [In Persian]
  31. Siavashi, Mehdi; Bazrafkon, Majid. (1400). The impact of the modern nation-state structure on the social disintegration of the West in the face of Corona. Scientific Quarterly of Contemporary Political Essays. Year 12, Number 4, pp. 405-428. [In Persian] 
  32. Tabatabaei, Seyyed Alireza. (1400). Feasibility of Imamat-Ummat system in virtual space. Islamic government magazine. 25th year, 4th issue, pp. 138-170. [In Persian] 
  33. Vafaeifard, Farhad; Khorasani, Reza. (2018). Comparative comparison of Ayatollah Beheshti's governance idea with good governance. Sublime politics magazine. Year 7, No. 26, pp. 153-172. [In Persian]
  34. Yousefi Sheikh Robat, Mohammad Reza; Babaei, Fahimeh. (2016). Extracting the components of good governance based on Malik Ashtar's letter and comparing it with the upper documents of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Nahj al-Balagha quarterly research journal. The sixth year, number 21, pp. 115-135. [In Persian]
  35. Zarei, Mojtabi; Araei, Vahid. (2019). Analyzing and criticizing the model of good governance; Explanation of Islamic governance indicators based on the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Research. Volume 1, No. 2, pp. 7-25. [In Persian] 
آینده پژوهی انقلاب اسلامی
دوره 4، شماره 3
فصلنامه پاییز
آبان 1402
صفحه 161-195

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 21 مرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 20 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 10 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ انتشار: 30 آبان 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار